NCDs vs LCDs: How Medicare Coverage Determinations Work for Device Companies
2026-09-20 · Caduvo Team
Medicare coverage happens through a two-tier system: national coverage determinations and local coverage determinations. Learn how MACs set policy, how to search the Medicare Coverage Database, and what to do when coverage is absent or restrictive.
A device gets FDA clearance. The next question a market access team asks is: Will Medicare pay for it? The answer is hidden inside a two-tier system: national coverage determinations and local coverage determinations. Knowing which layer controls your device — and how to search the Medicare Coverage Database — tells you whether you have a clear reimbursement path or a fight on your hands.
The two layers of Medicare coverage policy
Medicare coverage policy has two formal layers: National Coverage Determinations (NCDs) and Local Coverage Determinations (LCDs). An NCD is a decision made by CMS that applies to all Medicare contractors and beneficiaries nationwide. It is binding. If an NCD exists for a service, device, or procedure, every Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) must follow it exactly.
An LCD is a decision made by a MAC that applies only to the geographic jurisdiction that MAC serves. MACs are private companies contracted by CMS to process fee-for-service Medicare claims. They also develop LCDs when no NCD exists or when an NCD leaves room for interpretation. Because each MAC covers a different region, the same device can have different coverage criteria depending on where the patient lives.
The hierarchy is simple: NCD preempts LCD. If no NCD exists, the LCD in the patient's MAC jurisdiction controls. If neither an NCD nor an LCD exists, the MAC makes a case-by-case decision based on whether the service is reasonable and necessary under section 1862(a)(1)(A) of the Social Security Act. That phrase — "reasonable and necessary" — is the core legal standard for Medicare coverage.
Example: CMS has a national coverage determination for implantable cardioverter defibrillators that specifies which patients qualify. That NCD applies everywhere. For a newer spinal cord stimulation device with no NCD, each MAC may publish its own local coverage determination with slightly different patient selection criteria, and those differences can create real market access friction.
How Medicare Administrative Contractors set local policy
MACs are not just claims processors. They have medical directors and contractor advisory committees that review clinical evidence, specialty society guidelines, and local practice patterns when drafting LCDs. A MAC can initiate an LCD on its own, or it can respond to a formal request from a provider, manufacturer, or other stakeholder.
LCDs are public documents. They include:
- The specific indications, limitations, and medical necessity criteria for coverage.
- Related CPT and HCPCS codes.
- A narrative summary of the evidence considered.
- The effective date and jurisdiction.
MACs also publish companion documents called local coverage articles (LCAs). LCAs do not create or change coverage policy; they provide billing and coding instructions that support an LCD. Confusing an LCA with an LCD is a common mistake — the LCA tells you how to bill, but the LCD tells you whether it is covered.
Because each MAC has its own review process, LCDs for the same technology can appear months apart or never appear at all. A device company should track LCD activity across every MAC jurisdiction where it intends to sell.
How to research coverage in the Medicare Coverage Database
The Medicare Coverage Database (MCD) is the single source for all NCDs, LCDs, and related coverage documents. It is free and public, at cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database.
Researching a device usually takes less than an hour if you know what to look for. Follow this sequence:
- Search by HCPCS or CPT code, if you have one. Use the exact code or a code range.
- Search by keyword, such as the device name, clinical indication, or procedure.
- Search by diagnosis code if coverage depends on a specific condition.
- Filter results by document type: NCD, LCD, proposed LCD, or coverage article.
- Read the NCD or LCD document, not just the summary page. Pay attention to the coverage criteria and any limitations.
- For LCDs, note the MAC name and effective date. A proposed LCD is not yet in force, and a final LCD may have changed since comment.
The MCD also shows document history and links to decision memos, which explain the clinical rationale. If an NCD includes Coverage with Evidence Development (CED), the device is covered only when the patient is enrolled in an approved study or registry. That fact is often buried in the decision memo and missed during early market planning.
If you are still building your reimbursement strategy, start with Medical Device Reimbursement 101.
What to do when coverage is absent or restrictive
When the MCD shows no NCD and no LCD for your device, you are not automatically without options, but you are without a guarantee of payment. MACs can still cover services on a case-by-case basis, but that means every claim is individually adjudicated, and denial risk is high.
Concrete steps to take:
- Get a HCPCS code first. Without a code, coverage discussions are theoretical. If no existing code describes your device, apply for a new HCPCS code through CMS or use an unlisted code with a plan for eventual code assignment.
- Submit evidence to the MAC. You can ask a MAC to open an LCD reconsideration for a specific technology or indication. You must provide peer-reviewed clinical evidence, specialty society support, and a clear definition of the patient population that benefits.
- Request a national coverage analysis. If you face inconsistent LCDs or blanket non-coverage across multiple MACs, CMS can open an NCD analysis. This is a long and evidence-intensive process, but it resolves the problem once.
- Monitor proposed LCDs and comment. MACs publish proposed LCDs for public comment. If a proposed LCD would restrict your device, a coordinated comment letter from clinicians and professional societies can influence the final policy.
- Build a Coverage with Evidence Development strategy. For high-risk devices, CED may be the only path to Medicare payment. That requires a registry or study infrastructure before launch, not after.
A common mistake is to treat an unfavorable LCD as the end of the road when it is actually a local policy that can be challenged, refined, or renegotiated with the right clinical evidence. The other common mistake is to wait until after FDA clearance to start looking at coverage. The coverage questions should be answered at the same time you are choosing an FDA pathway.
Actionable takeaways
- Determine early whether an NCD or LCD controls your device category; the Medicare Coverage Database search takes less than an hour.
- An NCD binds all MACs; an LCD binds only one jurisdiction. Know which jurisdictions matter for your launch.
- If no coverage policy exists, your reimbursement risk is real but not insoluble. Build the clinical evidence package before you approach a MAC.
- Track proposed LCDs and comment deadlines across your target MAC regions.
- Separate coding from coverage. A HCPCS code is necessary but not sufficient for payment — coverage criteria are what drive claim approval.